Wednesday, 29 July 2009

Being clear about purpose

(The following represents Nigel Fenner's personal views, rather than those of Hertfordshire PASS.)

I am becoming more and more convinced that being clear about the purpose of a meeting, or event or organisation is key - if the vulnerable, or disenfranchised, or for that matter anyone taking part, are to take up a meaningful role.

Without clarity of purpose it is no surprise powerful individual(s) exert influence on what is going on. Often this is done with the best of intentions, and the results are often very good, and for all those taking part, there is often relief that someone strong, assertive and charismatic is leading. However in the work that I'm involved in, where we endeavour to build capacity in young disabled people to run their own work preparation programme ( - see http://www.hertspass.com/ ), it is no surprise 'how meetings, events and organisations are run and managed', is up for scrutiny.

Hertfordshire PASS is currently planning for the visit of a high ranking government minister to our offices, who wants to see the apprenticeship scheme we operate with and for young disabled people. The visit has been set up by another charity with a national brief striving to enable more disabled young people to access education.

Whilst the purpose of the visit may appear obvious, in dialogue with this charity, we have identified a number of potential agendas that the visit will not have time to fully cover. We at Hertfordshire PASS believe very strongly the 3 apprentices should have a closed meeting with the minister 'to give opportunity for PASS's apprentices to share their experiences of being an apprentice, and as a result of these experiences explore what might be done to enable more disabled young people to take up apprenticeships'.

Such a purpose obviously restricts what the charity we are working with can contribute to the visit, as well as other partners involved in the apprenticeship scheme, such as the local college. It also limits what Hertfordshire PASS might do to raise its profile more generally in showcasing its other work and staff. With this in mind we are planning a short meeting with the minister to follow the closed meeting with the apprentices, to share our experiences - as organisations - in contributing towards the apprenticeship programme.

Of course none of the above accounts for what the government minister believes the purpose of the visit is. However if we're not clear about the purpose as we understand it, it will be no surprise the government minister will fill the vacuum by taking up the 'strong, assertive and charismatic' role of the powerful we want to avoid.

Finally, I believe that unless the purpose of a meeting, event or organisation is worked on to ensure it is clear, explicit and acted on, it is very difficult for 'disabled people' to shake off this label and take up a different role, such as 'apprentice', and 'shaper' of government policy and practice we hope will occur when the government minister comes visiting.

Tuesday, 30 June 2009

Everyday experience at work: vital to disabled young people exploring the world of work

(The following represents Nigel Fenner's personal views, rather than those of Hertfordshire PASS.)

I have had two recent experiences of projects failing to appreciate the value of their day-to-day work experience to disabled people. The first experience relates to a management group convening for the first time to deliver a European Social Funded programme providing work related skills and opportunities to people with mental health problems. I asked why such people could not be part of the management group, if for no other reason than to experience a meeting and how it is managed, how people behave, how people get heard, how disagreements are resolved, how progress is made etc. There appeared to be agreement to start with, closely followed by a number of obstacles (such as how big the management group would grow to). The outcome is a users reference group, separate from the management group.

The other experience relates to some early plans to explore how best to develop and train an apprentice bookkeeper. When I suggested that the individual (yet to be appointed) might have a day observing the 3 bookkeepers in the department this was met with scepticism. Their understanding was that the apprentice bookkeeper would be trained first before they would be able to get involved and contribute in the office. Whilst I agreed there was a need for technical training, why couldn't the minute by minute bookkeeping experiences such as dealing with customers on the phone, entering data on the computer and exploring issues together as a team, be made available to an apprentice to observe?

Whenever possible I always open up what I am doing to one or more of our apprentices and following a period of observation I might ask for their first impressions and / or provide a context for what is going on etc - taking no more than a few minutes of my time to do so. Not only does it keep me on my toes in terms of being clear about what I do and why, but it gives insight for the apprentice, into how to take up a role ( - which you can never get through a text book or training).

In addition to making the second by second work experiences of staff available to disabled young people ( - as described above), we also have a scheme where ordinary adults visit us to share their work story in response to questions from a group of disabled young people - who lead the discussion. Afterwards the adults who take part are often unsure whether what they said was of value. To test this out we asked our 3 apprentices, who took part in these discussions, what was the most significant story they could recall from the 10 or so visitors we've had. Firstly they recalled one successful manager who left school with no qualifications, then another visitor who said her biggest barrier to starting out in work was her shyness, and the third visitor who said he went out to get his first job because he didn't want to keep asking his mum for pocket money. These may appear trivial but for young disabled people setting out on the 'work trail' they are invaluable.

So why can't we provide opportunity to young disabled people to observe the day to day experiences we all have? There's a lot more value in them than we think.